Howard Barker’s theatre of catastrophe depicts subjects in violent crisis from which they can hardly escape. Such crises which generally happen in socio-political transformations of power enforce the subjects to subjectivise themselves. Accordingly, a socio-political crisis is seen in his Victory. The catastrophic transformation of power from Cromwell’s puritan administration to Charles II’s government compels the play’s characters to enter the process of self-fashioning. Such subjectivization of self can be analyzed by two Fouacauldian concepts about power: “co-extensiveness of power and resistance” and “assujettissement”. The researcher, then, tries to apply these theoretical frameworks to Victory. This study, at last, shows that the mentioned framework and the characters’ strategies of resistance in Victory are concordant.
Angel-Perez, Elizabeth. âFacing Defacement: Barker and Levinasâ. In Theatre of Catastrophe, eds. Gritzner and Rabey. London: Oberon (2006): 136-149.
Barker, Howard. Collected Plays. New York: John Calder Publishers, 1990.
Barker, Howard. The Arguments for a Theatre. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1993.
Butler, Judith. The Psychic Life of Power: Theories in Subjection. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1977.
Dreyfus, Hubert L. and Paul Rabino. Michel Foucault; Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Foucault, Michel. Essential Works I (Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth). New York: The New Press, 2000.
---------. Essential Works III (Power). New York: The Nw Press, 2000.
---------. Remarks on Marx. New York: Semiotext(e), 1981.
---------. Discipline and Punish, the Birth of Prison. New York: Vintage, 1977.
---------. Will to Knowledge (History of Sexuality Vol I). Trans. Robert Hurley. New
York: Pantheon Books, 1976.
Grant, Steve. âBarkerâs Biteâ. Plays and Players (Nov, 1975): 36-39.
Hoy, David Couzens. Critical Resistance: From Poststructuralism to Post-Critique. London: The MIT Press, 2004.
Kelly, Mark G. E. The Political Philosophy of Michel Foucault. New York: Routledge, 2009.
Lamb, Charles. The Theatre of Howard Barker. London: Routledge, 2005.
Megson, Chris. âHoward Barker and Theatre of Catasropheâ. In A Companion to Modern British and Irish Drama. ed. Mary Luckhurst. Plackwll publishing (2006): 488-498.
Ed. Mary Luckhurst. Plackwll publishing, 2006.
Pickett, Brent L. âFoucult and Politics of Resistanceâ. Polity 28.4 (Summer, 1996): 445-466.
Rabey, David Ian. Howard Barker: Politics of Desire. New York: Palgrave, 1989.
Zimmermann, Heiner. âImages of Death in Howard barkerâs Theatreâ. In Theatre of Catasrophe. Eds. Gritzner and Rabey, London: Oberon (2006): 211-230.
Farzaneh Dehkordi, J. (2019). The Co-extensiveness of Power and Resistance: A Foucauldian Reading of Howard Barker’s Victory. Critical Language and Literary studies, 16(22), 191-212. doi: 10.29252/clls.16.22.191
MLA
Jalal Farzaneh Dehkordi. "The Co-extensiveness of Power and Resistance: A Foucauldian Reading of Howard Barker’s Victory", Critical Language and Literary studies, 16, 22, 2019, 191-212. doi: 10.29252/clls.16.22.191
HARVARD
Farzaneh Dehkordi, J. (2019). 'The Co-extensiveness of Power and Resistance: A Foucauldian Reading of Howard Barker’s Victory', Critical Language and Literary studies, 16(22), pp. 191-212. doi: 10.29252/clls.16.22.191
VANCOUVER
Farzaneh Dehkordi, J. The Co-extensiveness of Power and Resistance: A Foucauldian Reading of Howard Barker’s Victory. Critical Language and Literary studies, 2019; 16(22): 191-212. doi: 10.29252/clls.16.22.191
)