Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Abstract

In the age of considerable progress in technology by simulation, machines have become the extension of human bodies and have blurred the boundary between nature and culture. The researcher investigates Margaret Atwood’s environmental concerns who demands a theoretical framework regarding the cultural system as ecological phenomena. Throughout this article, the researcher re- evaluates what it is to be human in Oryx and Crake (2003) and attempts to define the posthuman condition and the notion of ecposthumanism. It also investigates the deconstruction of the humanist vision through such a posthumanist reading of Margaret Atwood’s novel and highlights the possibility of the posthuman and the human being able to survive together in a dystopia created by harsh intervention of human to the realm of nonhuman. The researcher through the lens of posthumanism as one branch of ecocriticism investigatesAtwood's characters and the role of technology and nature

Keywords

  1. منابع:
  2. روویون، فردریک، آرمانشهر در تاریخ اندیشه غرب، عباس باقری، تهران: نشر نی، 1385
  3. فرشید، سیما و الهه رضایی "نقش ایدئولوژی آموزشی در حفظ نظام سرمایه‌داری در رمان‌های آریکس و کریک و سال سیل اثر مارگارت آتوود". فصل نامه علمی پژ.وهشی نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی، پاییز و زمستان 1392
  4. Atwood, Margaret. Oryx and Crake. New York: Talese, (2003).
  5. _____________. The Handmaid's Tale. London: Virago Press, 1985
  6. Bouson. J. Brooks, ‘We’re Using Up the Earth. It’s Almost Gone’: A Return to the Post-Apocalyptic Future in Margaret Atwood’s TheYear of the Flood’, Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 46:1 (2011)
  7. Buell, Lawrence. The Environmental imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing and the Formation of American Culture. London: Princeton University Press. (1995).
  8. Carson, Rachel. Silent Spring, London: Penguin.( 1999).
  9. Fukuyama, Francis, Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution,
  10. London ,(2003).
  11. Garrard, Greg. Ecocriticism. London and New York: Routledge.(2004)
  12. Glotfelty, Cheryll and Harold Fromm (Eds).The Ecocriticism Reader: Landmarks in Literary Ecology. Athens: University of Georgia Press. (1996).
  13. Glover, Jayne. ‘Human/Nature: Ecological Philosophy in Margaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake’ [Accessed 8 March 2014].
  14. Haraway D. Simians, Cyborgs and Women – The Reinvention of Nature,London, Free Association Books.( 1991).
  15. Hayles N. K. How We Became Posthuman – Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics,Literature and Informatics, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago and London, (1999).
  16. Howells Coral Ann. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006).
  17. Huggan, Graham and Helen Tiffin.Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, and Environment. London and New York: Routledge,( 2010).
  18. Heise, Ursula K. "The Hitchhiker's Guide to Ecocriticism". PMLA 121.2.PP. (2006)
  19. Ingersoll, Earl G., “Survival in Margaret Atwood’s Novel Oryx and Crake”, Extrapolation,XLV(Summer 2004), 162-175.
  20. Kerridge, Richard and Neil Sammells (Eds).Writing the Environment: Ecocriticism and Literature. London: Zed Books. (1998).
  21. Phillips, Dana. The Truth of Ecology: Nature, Culture, and Literature in America. New York: Oxford University Press.(2003).
  22. Synder K. “‘Time to Go’: the Post-Apocalyptic and the Post-Traumatic inMargaret Atwood’s Oryx and Crake”, Studies in the Novel, 43: 4, pp. 470-489. (2011).
  23. Teeuwen, Rudolphus. ‘Ecocriticism, Humanism, EschatalogicalJouissance: J. G. Ballard and the Ends of the World’, TamkangReview, 39:2 (2009)
  24. Tolan, Fiona. Margaret Atwood – Feminism and Fiction, Editions Rodopi B.V.,Amsterdam-New York NY. (2007).
  25. Wolfe, Cary.What is Posthumanism?, University of Minnesota Press,Minneapolis and London. (2010).