Document Type : علمی - پژوهشی

Author

IAU-Central Tehran Branch

Abstract

The present research attempts to accomplish a re-reading of the novel Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut, specifically in the light of Gilles Deleuze’s theoretical frame of mind centralized on the notion of ‘becoming’. This central idea of becoming versus being grounds Deleuze’s philosophical and critical approach toward every phenomenon, and particularly, discourse such as art, philosophy and literature. Like other post-structuralists, Deleuze believes that the major problem with the traditional Western thought since the time of Plato has been the essentiality of transcendentalism and concludes that this needs to be subverted. He accomplishes his theory by verifying the necessity of overcoming Platonism and thus, authorizing becoming. In fact, by deviating from an established origin or transcendental universe we ground the thought on the immanence of becoming. In this view, everything is just flowing in the flux of becoming-life. From Deleuze’s viewpoint, philosophy, literature and science are the powers of becoming by entailing new non-actualized possibilities. Accordingly, the present research reads through the lines of Slaughterhouse-Five as a text of becoming opposed to verisimilitude. This study tries to show the dominance of Deleuzean thought through the investigation of elements like form, the episodic narrative, the split time and psyches of characters, as well as the absence of causal relation between events. Thus, it is found that under the light of Deleuze’s notion of minor literature, Slaughterhouse-Five brings various forms of becoming in play to liberate text, thought, philosophy, history and life itself from the pre-determined images and definitions in order to show how the writer tried to cope with the traumatic memory of war and massacre by experiencing different forms of becoming and re-narrating war events from different perspectives.

Keywords

  1. ونه‌‌‌گات،کرت،(1969)، سلاّخ‌خانه شماره پنج، ترجمه ع.ا. بهرامی، اسکن توسط:bolevrk.www.goog-life.ir
  2. دی کارسن، بنیامین، (2001)، "به سوی هنر سیاسی پسامدرن: دلوز، گتاری و کتاب ضد فرهنگ"، ترجمه ماندانا منصوری،.www.noormagazine.com
  3. Colebrook, Claire. 2002. Gilles Deleuze. New York: Routledge .
  4. Deleuze, Gilles and FelixGuattari. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophernia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota P.
  5. Deleuze, Gilles and Felix Guattari. Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Trans. Helen R. Lane and Robert Hurley. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1985.
  6. Deleuze, Gilles and FelixGuattari. Spring 1985. "Kafka: Toward a Minor Literature: The Components of Expression." New Literary History 16 (3): 591-608.
  7. Landa, Manuel De. 1999. "Deleuze and Open-Ended Becomig of the World." cddc.vt.edu. Jan 10. Accessed 10 11, 2015. www.cddc.vt.edu/host/delanda/pages/becoming.htm.
  8. May, Todd. 2005. Gilles Deleuze: An Introduction . New York: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Ruby, Christopher. 2014.Rhizomatic Narrative and Rhizomatic Meaning: Kurt Vonnegut’s Lines of Flight and the Schizoanalysis of the Postmodern Unconscious. M.A. Thesis on English Literature, Humanitis Facaulty, Edinburgh University: 50 pages.
  10. Vitale, Tom. 2011. "npr books: Kurt Vonnegut: Still Speaking To The War Weary." NPR Web Site. May 31. Accessed July 12, 2015. http://www.npr.org.