Assemblages of Power: Material Agency, Posthumanism, and the Ecology of Shakespeare’s The Tempest

مقالات آماده انتشار

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار، دانشکده زبانها و ادبیات خارجی دانشگاه تهران ، تهران، ایران

چکیده

This article examines Shakespeare’s The Tempest in the context of posthumanism and material ecocriticism, arguing that the play anticipates the modern discourse of distributed agency and ecological interdependence. It will show how The Tempest subverts the classical categories of Renaissance humanism by examining Prospero’s interaction with the natural elements, Ariel’s liminal being and Caliban’s ambivalence between culture and nature. By using Rosi Braidotti’s posthuman subject and Jane Bennett’s theory of vibrant materialism, the study explains how the play does not advocate anthropocentrism and is dominated by agency, sovereignty and consciousness. On the island, human and non-human actors appear as agentive assemblages and micropolitical sites of power relations. This understanding is based on three core elements: the physical materiality of the island and its agency, the way magic is performed by a range of people, and the representation of non-human consciousness in the play. This analysis locates The Tempest as an early modern text and a work of environmental humanities, allowing for a better understanding of non-human agency, existence in Braidotti’s posthumanism and anthropology. The play does not negatively engage with the nexus of magic, nature and human export, but uses it to reinforce its exploration of global warming, ecological justice and human agency. This notion expands the field of history and politics of Shakespeare and the followers of ecological thinking by helping them understand the historical rootedness of ecological thinking without transcending the rationally imposed concerns common in our time.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assemblages of Power: Material Agency, Posthumanism, and the Ecology of Shakespeare’s The Tempest

نویسنده [English]

  • Ali Salami
Associate Professor, Faculty of Foreign Languages and Literatures, University of Tehran
چکیده [English]

This article examines Shakespeare’s The Tempest in the context of posthumanism and material ecocriticism, arguing that the play anticipates the modern discourse of distributed agency and ecological interdependence. It will show how The Tempest subverts the classical categories of Renaissance humanism by examining Prospero’s interaction with the natural elements, Ariel’s liminal being and Caliban’s ambivalence between culture and nature. By using Rosi Braidotti’s posthuman subject and Jane Bennett’s theory of vibrant materialism, the study explains how the play does not advocate anthropocentrism and is dominated by agency, sovereignty and consciousness. On the island, human and non-human actors appear as agentive assemblages and micropolitical sites of power relations. This understanding is based on three core elements: the physical materiality of the island and its agency, the way magic is performed by a range of people, and the representation of non-human consciousness in the play. This analysis locates The Tempest as an early modern text and a work of environmental humanities, allowing for a better understanding of non-human agency, existence in Braidotti’s posthumanism and anthropology. The play does not negatively engage with the nexus of magic, nature and human export, but uses it to reinforce its exploration of global warming, ecological justice and human agency. This notion expands the field of history and politics of Shakespeare and the followers of ecological thinking by helping them understand the historical rootedness of ecological thinking without transcending the rationally imposed concerns common in our time.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Shakespeare
  • posthumanism
  • ecocriticism
  • agency
  • materiality
  • early modern drama

مراجع

Adamson, David. 1989. “Authority and Illusion: The Power of Prospero's Book.”
Agrippa, Heinrich Cornelius. 1993. Three Books of Occult Philosophy. Translated by James Freake. Edited by Donald Tyson. St. Paul, MN: Llewellyn Publications.
Aisher, Alex, and Vinita Damodaran. 2016. “Introduction: Human-Nature Interactions through a Multispecies Lens.” Conservation and Society 14 (4): 293–304. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.197612.
Alaimo, Stacy. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Alexander, Catherine. 2007. “The Late Plays: Review of The Tempest (directed by Rupert Goold) at the Royal Shakespeare Theatre, August 2006; and Cymbeline (directed by Emma Rice for Kneehigh Theatre) at the Swan, September 2006.” Shakespeare 3 (2): 217–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450910701460981.
Bacon, Francis. 1902. Novum Organum. Edited by Joseph Devey. New York: P.F. Collier.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, Jane. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Braidotti, Rosi. 2013. The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bright, Timothy. 1586. A Treatise of Melancholy. London: Thomas Vautrollier.
Carroll, William C. 1985. The Metamorphoses of Shakespearean Comedy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400854813.
Daigle, Christine, and Terrance H. McDonald, eds. 2022. From Deleuze and Guattari to Posthumanism: Philosophies of Immanence.
De Pascalis, Ilaria A. 2023. “Book Review: Posthuman Feminism.” European Journal of Women's Studies 30 (2): 266–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/13505068221144964.
Haraway, Donna. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Harding, Sandra. 1992. “Subjectivity, Experience and Knowledge: An Epistemology from/for Rainbow Coalition Politics.” Development and Change 23 (3): 175–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1992.tb00461.x.
Henslowe, Philip. 2002. Henslowe's Diary. Edited by R. A. Foakes. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hiscox, Jennifer, et al. 2017. “Threesomes Destabilise Certain Relationships: Multispecies Interactions between Wood Decay Fungi in Natural Resources.” FEMS Microbiology Ecology 93 (3). https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fix014.
Jones, Gwilym. 2014. “Shakespeare's Storms.” In Weather, Climate, and the Environment in Shakespeare's England, 181–184. https://doi.org/10.7765/9781526111852.
Jun, Hyun-Shik, et al. 2021. “Posthuman Subjectivity and Singularity in the Nature-Culture Continuum.” Social Epistemology 35 (1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2020.1737750.
Linhart Wood, Jennifer. 2016. “Shakespeare Association of America 2016 Novel / Traveling Objects.”
Marshall, Yvonne, and Benjamin Alberti. 2014. “A Matter of Difference: Karen Barad, Ontology and Archaeological Bodies.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 24 (1): 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959774314000067.
Martin, Randall. 2015. Shakespeare and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199567027.001.0001.
Matei, Adela. 2024. “Figuring Displacement: Spaces of Imagination in Early Modern and Postmodern Intertextual Transmissions.” Multicultural Shakespeare: Translation, Appropriation and Performance 29. https://doi.org/10.18778/2083-8530.29.05.
Mentz, Steve. 2009. “Toward a Blue Cultural Studies: The Sea, Maritime Culture, and Early Modern English Literature.” Literature Compass 6 (5): 997–1013. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-4113.2009.00655.x.
Mowat, Barbara A. 2001. “Prospero's Book.” Shakespeare Quarterly 52 (1): 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1353/shq.2001.0016.
Pye, Christopher. 2013. “Storm at Sea: The Tempest, Cultural Materialism and the Early Modern Political Aesthetic.” English Studies 94 (3): 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013838X.2013.778626.
Rose, McKenna. 2017. “Surviving The Tempest: Ecologies of Salvage on the Early Modern Stage.” Shakespeare 13 (3): 271–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450918.2017.1317283.
Shakespeare, William. 2016. The Tempest. Edited by Barbara A. Mowat and Paul Werstine. New York: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks.
Taguchi, Hillevi Lenz. 2012. “A Diffractive and Deleuzian Approach to Analysing Interview Data.” Feminist Theory 13 (3): 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464700112456001.
Topsell, Edward. 1607. The Historie of Foure-Footed Beastes. London: William Jaggard.
Utter, Ashley, et al. 2021. “Co-creation of Knowledge in Agroecology.” Elementa: Science of the Anthropocene 9 (1). https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2021.00026.
Van der Voet, Rosanne, et al. 2023. “The Inexhaustible.” Journal of Posthumanism 3 (1). https://doi.org/10.33182/joph.v3i1.1710.
Van der Zaag, Annette-Carina, et al. 2016. “On Posthuman Subjectivity.” Journal of Cultural Economy 9 (3): 330–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/17530350.2015.1040436.
Vivaldi, Jordi, et al. 2021. “Xenological Subjectivity: Rosi Braidotti and Object-Oriented Ontology.” Open Philosophy 4 (1): 311–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0187.
Wynter, Sylvia. 2003. “Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, after Man, Its Overrepresentation—an Argument.” CR: The New Centennial Review 3 (3): 257–337. https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2004.0015.
Zhou, Mingying, and Xiaohong Zhang. 2024. “Between Realms: The Island as a Liminal Space of Redemption and Fantasy in The Tempest and Lost.” Island Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.24043/001c.126242.
نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی

مقالات آماده انتشار، پذیرفته شده
انتشار آنلاین از تاریخ 04 بهمن 1403

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار