تکلیف بله، اماچه نوع تکلیفی می تواند به بیشترین میزان پیشرفت و انگیزه منجر شود؟

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

دانشگاه تهران

چکیده

چکیدهمطالعه حاضر تأثیر انواع مختلف تکلیف را بر روی میزان پیشرفت و انگیزه زبان آموزان بررسی می کند. تا کنون شش نوع مختلف از تکلیف معرفی شده اند: تمرینی، آماده سازی، گسترده و مداوم، اکتشافی هدایت شده، دنیای واقعی و پروژه ها. در این مطالعه 51 نفر از زبان آموزان بزرگسال کانون زبان ایران در سطح متوسط انتخاب و به سه گروه 17 نفره تقسیم شدند. به گروه اول فقط تکلیف تمرینی، به گروه دوم تکلیف آماده سازی و به گروه سوم تکلیف گسترده داده شد. مدت انجام این مطالعه یک ترم (20 جلسه) بود و در نهایت نتایج آزمون پایان ترم کانون و امتحان شفاهی برای سنجش میزان پیشرفت و نتایج یک پرسشنامه و یک مصاحبه نیمه ساختارمند برای بررسی انگیزه زبان آموزان مورد استفاده قرار گرفت. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزارهای SPSS (برای آزمون پایان ترم و امتحان شفاهی) و NVivo (برای پرسشنامه و مصاحبه) انجام شد. در نهایت در آزمون پایان ترم دوگروه تکلیف آماده سازی و تکلیف گسترده پیشرفتی بیشتر از گروه تکلیف تمرینی داشتند و در امتحان شفاهی هم گروه تکلیف گسترده بهترین عملکرد را از خود نشان داد. همچنین دو گروه تکلیف آماده سازی و تکلیف گسترده به عوامل انگیزشی بیشتری در پاسخ های خود اشاره کردند.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

English Homework, Achievement, and Motivation

نویسندگان [English]

  • azadeh rajaei
  • Davood Borzabadi Farahani
دانشگاه تهران
چکیده [English]

English Homework, Achievement, and Motivation IntroductionIn many countries of the world, homework accounts for a considerable proportion of study time (Cooper, 1989; Cooper, Lindsay, Nye, & Greathouse, 1998; Xu, 2005). At the same time, the effectiveness of homework has been discussed a lot, and studies investigating the relationship between homework and achievement have produced mixed results. Most previous research on homework has focused on homework time and analyzed the relationship between homework and achievement (Cooper, Robinson, & Patall, 2006). However, according to Corno (1996), homework is a complex process affected by a variety of factors. Previous research fails to reflect the complexity of the variables involved in homework assignment and homework completion, and the methodological pitfalls of many studies make it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the strength of the homework achievement relationship (Trautwein, 2007). Background StudiesThe few empirical studies to date that have included homework variables indicate beneficial effects of  homework. For instance, in their comprehensive study Trautwein, Niggli, Schnyder, and Lu¨dtke (2009) asked teachers about their homework attitudes and behaviors. Overall, they found a relatively low emphasis on drill and practice tasks and a high emphasis on motivation. Cooper (1989) distinguished between homework containing same-day tasks and homework including elements of practice and preparation and found that cognitively more demanding homework assignments were much more favorable and beneficial.In another study, using structural equation modeling, Keith and Cool (1992) found that giving a combination of practice and project homework was positively associated with a higher motivation, which in turn was positively related to achievement. Method The present study examines the effect of different types of homework on learners' language achievement and motivation. Six types of homework have been introduced naming practice, preparation, extensive, guided discovery, real world, and project homework. In this study 3 groups of intermediate level students were chosen from ILI in Babolsar each group containing 17 adult female learners. The first group had only practice homework (the ILI workbook), the second group received preparation homework and the third group had to do extensive homework. The treatment took a whole term (20 sessions) and the ILI final exam scores in addition to an oral exam were used to measure the students' achievement. A questionnaire was also employed which consisted of close and open ended questions. Furthermore, 12 learners (4 learners of each group) participated in a semi-structured interview in Farsi at the end of the term.Conclusion / Discussion The results of the final and oral exam were analyzed using SPSS and the qualitative data of the questionnaire and the interview have been examined with N-VIVO (8).The 2nd and 3rd groups outperformed in both final and oral exams. The group with extensive homework outperformed the other two in oral exam. And the group with extensive homework had the highest level of motivation while preparation homework group was next. 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • practice homework
  • preparation homework
  • extensive homework
  • achievement
  • motivation
Alston-Abel, N. L., & Berninger, V. W. (2018). Relationships between home literacy practices and school achievement: Implications for consultation and home–school collaboration. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 28(2), 164-189.
Cooper, H. (1989). Research on teaching monograph series. Homework. New York, NY, US: Longman. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/11578-000 
Cooper, H., Lindsay, J. J., Nye, B., & Greathouse, S. (1998). Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 70-83.
Cooper, H., Robinson, J.C., & Patall, E.A. (2006). Does homework improve academic achievement? A synthesis of research. 1987-2003. Review of Educational Research, 76(1), 1-62.
Corno, L. (1996). Homework is a complicated thing. Educational Researcher, 25, 27-30.
Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (2002). Handbook of Self-determination Research. Rochester, NY, US. University Rochester Press.
Derakhshesh, A., Fatemi Jahromi, S. A. (1396). Motivational Beliefs: Impact on the Capacity to Employ Self-regulatory strategies. Critical Language & Literary Studies, 19, 141-167.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
Emerson, T.L., Mencken, K. D. (2001). Homework: to require or not? Online graded homework and student achievement. Perspectives on Economic Education Research, 7(1), 20-42.
Foyle, H. C. (1985). Homework in the Classroom: Can it make a difference in student achievement? Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (40th; Chicago, IL, March 25, 1985).
Grodner, A., Rupp, N. G. (2013). The Role of Homework in Student Learning Outcomes: Evidence from a Field Experiment. The Journal of Economic Education, 44(2), 93-109.
Hong, E., Mason, E., Peng, Y., & Lee, N. (2016): Effects of homework motivation and worry anxiety on homework achievement in mathematics and English. Educational Research and Evaluation, DOI: 10.1080/13803611.2015.1131721
Katz, I., Eilot, K., & Nevo, N. (2014). ‘‘I’ll do it later’’: Type of motivation, self-efficacy and homework procrastination. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 111-119.
Keith, T.Z., Cool, V.A. (1992). Testing models of school learning: Effects of quality of instruction, motivation, academic coursework, and homework on academic achievement. School Psychology Quarterly, 7(3), 207–226.
Lee, Jr., Pruitt, K. W. (1979). Homework assignments: classroom games or teaching tools?. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, 53(1), 31-35.
Meshkinmehr, A., Pourmohammad, M., Nushi, M., Talkhabi, M.  (1398). Investigating the Effect of Applying Brain-based Learning Principles on the Learning and Retention of Vocabulary by EFL Learners. Critical Language & Literary Studies, 19 , 239 – 269.
Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667-686.
Ramdass, D., Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Developing self-regulation skills: The important role of homework. Journal of Advanced Academics, 22(2), 194–218. 
Trautwein, U., Köller, O. (2003). The relationship between homework and achievement – still much of a mystery. Educational Psychology Review, 15, 115-145.
Trautwein, U., Ludtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli. A. (2006). Predicting homework effort:
          Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 438–456.
Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework–achievement relation reconsidered: Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17(3), 372-388.
Trautwein, U., Niggli, A., Schnyder, I., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Between-teacher differences in homework assignments and the development of students' homework effort, homework emotions, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(1), 176-189. 
Trost, S., & Salehi-Isfahani. (2012). The effect of homework on exam performance: Experimental results from principles of economics. Southern Economic Journal,79(1), 224-242.
Vdovina, E., Gaibisso, C. (2013). Developing critical thinking in the English language classroom: A lesson plan. ELTA Journal, 1(1), 54-68.
Warton, P. M. (2001). The forgotten voices in homework: Views of students. Educational Psychologist, 36, 155-165.
Xu, J. (2005). Purposes for doing homework reported by middle and high school students. The Journal of Educational Research, 99, 46–55.