The Dualistic Dynamics of Plumwoodian Philosophy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 M.A. in English Literature, English Department, School of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University

2 استادیار، دانشکده ادبیات دانشگاه ارومیه

چکیده

This article examines Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997) through the lens of Val Plumwood’s ecofeminism. In her novel, Roy illustrates how Ammu, the focal character of this research, suffers from cultural, ideological, social, and economic exploitation and subjugation. Nature is likewise irresponsibly degraded and deteriorated by humans in the novel. While scholars have analyzed this novel from diverse ecocritical, feminist, ecofeminist, and postcolonial ecofeminist perspectives, it has not been examined through Plumwood’s theoretical framework. This study presents an ecofeminist reading of the novel, employing Plumwood’s concept of “dualism” and its three key features, namely, “backgrounding (denial),” “radical exclusion (hyperseparation),” as well as “instrumentalism (objectification).” We argue that the dualistic structures associated with gender, caste, and social class are dismantled by Ammu, even though she is subjected to backgrounding, radical exclusion, and instrumentalism by both her family and society. Furthermore, nature, which is also vulnerable to exploitation, challenges humanity’s anthropocentric dominance. The findings indicate that, despite the oppressive cultural, social, and ideological forces within Indian society, both Ammu and nature display resilience and agency. Although Ammu meets a tragic end, she heroically dies as an active resister of man-made laws rather than as a passive conformist.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Dualistic Dynamics of Plumwoodian Philosophy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sotoudeh Mijani 1
  • Haleh Zargarzadeh 2
1 M.A. in English Literature, English Department, School of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University
2 Assistant Professor of English, English Department, School of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University.
چکیده [English]

This article examines Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997) through the lens of Val Plumwood’s ecofeminism. In her novel, Roy illustrates how Ammu, the focal character of this research, suffers from cultural, ideological, social, and economic exploitation and subjugation. Nature is likewise irresponsibly degraded and deteriorated by humans in the novel. While scholars have analyzed this novel from diverse ecocritical, feminist, ecofeminist, and postcolonial ecofeminist perspectives, it has not been examined through Plumwood’s theoretical framework. This study presents an ecofeminist reading of the novel, employing Plumwood’s concept of “dualism” and its three key features, namely, “backgrounding (denial),” “radical exclusion (hyperseparation),” as well as “instrumentalism (objectification).” We argue that the dualistic structures associated with gender, caste, and social class are dismantled by Ammu, even though she is subjected to backgrounding, radical exclusion, and instrumentalism by both her family and society. Furthermore, nature, which is also vulnerable to exploitation, challenges humanity’s anthropocentric dominance. The findings indicate that, despite the oppressive cultural, social, and ideological forces within Indian society, both Ammu and nature display resilience and agency. Although Ammu meets a tragic end, she heroically dies as an active resister of man-made laws rather than as a passive conformist.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Arundhati Roy
  • The God of Small Things
  • Val Plumwood
  • Ammu
  • nature
  • dualism
  1. Ali, Halimah Mohamed. 2018. “Indigenous Identity and Hybridity in the Indian Context as Portrayed in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS) 2: 74-85.
  2. Bhattacharjee, Archana. 2012. “Ecocriticism in The God of Small Things and The Inheritance of Loss.” Galaxy: International Multidiscipline Research JournalIV: 1-4.
  3. Borade, Alka, and Atima Singh. 2020. “Environmental Constructions and Ecocritical Observation in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Thing.” The Criterion: An International Journal in English 11:vi 78-86.
  4. Cavalcanti, Sofia. 2021. “The Meenachal River as Vital Materiality in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” MediAzioni 30: 49-69.
  5. Chae, Youngsuk. 2015. “Postcolonial Ecofeminism in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing 5: 519-530.
  6. Cuomo, Chris. 2002. “On Ecofeminist Philosophy.” Ethics and The Environment 2: 1-11.
  7. Elahi, Maqbool, and Afzal Khan. 2023. “The Impacts of Globalization on the Natural Environment: A Case Study of The God of Small Things.” The Dialogue 2: 1-5.
  8. Ezzy, Douglas. 2004. “Old Traditions and New Ages: Religions and environments.” In Controversies in Environmental Sociology, edited by Rob White. New York: Cambridge University Press, 8-25. 
  9. Freed, Joanne Lipson. 2011. “The Ethics of Identification: The Global Circulation of Traumatic Narrative in Silko’s Ceremony and Roy’s The God of Small Things.” Comparative Literature Studies 2: 219-240.
  10. Gaard, Greta. 1993. “Living Interconnections with Animals and Nature.” In Ecofeminism: Women, Animals, Nature. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1-12.
  11. Kheel, Marti. 2008. Nature Ethics: An Ecofeminist Perspective. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
  12. Kunhi, Rukhaya Mohammad, and Zeenath Mohamed Kunhi. 2017. “An Ecocritical Perspective of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” SAGE 2: 1-6.
  13. Maral, Priyanka. 2013. “Ecocriticism in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science4: 40-42.
  14. Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of Labour. London: Zed Books.
  15. Plumwood, Val. 2002. Environmental Culture: The Ecological Crises of Reason. London: Routledge.
  16. ---. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
  17. ---. 1990. “Women, Nature and Philosophy: An Exploration of Self and Gender in Relation to Traditional Dualism in Western Culture.” Ph.D. Dissertation. Australian National University.
  18. Roy, Arundhati. 1997. The God of Small Things. New York: Random House.
  19. Sanei, Dianoosh, and Jalal Sokhanvar. 2017. “Cultural-Environmental Discourses in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid Tale.Critical Language and Literary Studies 14. 19: 209-231.
  20. Singh, Kuldeep. 2019. “Arundhati Roy’s Feminist View in The God of Small Things: A Perspective.” Research Review International Journal of Multidisciplinary 4: 2424-2428.
  21. Tavousi, Sohrab, and Shohreh Chavoshian. 2019. “The Ecocritical Reading of Vladimir Nabokov's Pnin.” Critical Language and Literary studies22: 119-142.
  22. Thormann, Janet. 2003. “The Ethical Subject of The God of Small Things.” Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society 2: 299-307.
  23. TP, Vimal Angeline, and Jyotshna Singh. 2024. “An Ecocritical Analysis of Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things.” International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation 4: 287-291.
  24. Yasin, Ghulam. 2024. “Othering Nature in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things: A Postcolonial Ecocritical Study.” Interlitteraria1: 188-199.
  25. Zorriyeh Habib, Shokofeh, Leila Baradaran Jamili, and Bahman Zarrinjooee. 2024. “Eco-Grief Induced Crisis: Resilience of Eco-Trauma and Sense of Ending in Jonathan Franzen’s Freedom.” Critical Language and Literary Studies31: 187-207.