مساله آگاهی در عصر متامدرن؛ بازنگاهی بر رمان ساعت‌های استخوان نوشته دیوید میچل

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب

2 دپارتمان زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران جنوب، تهران، ایران

3 استادیار گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، گروه زبان و ادبیات انگلیسی، واحد رودهن، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران

چکیده

این مقاله بر آن است تا به بررسی مساله‌ آگاهی در رمان ساعت‌های استخوان نوشته دیوید میچل به عنوان رمانی متامدرنیستی نشسته و به تبیین آن در عصر متامدرن بپردازد. به طور مشخص، این مقاله در ابتدا به تعریف آگاهی پرداخته و خصوصیات مساله‌ آگاهی در دوره جدید را بررسی می‌کند. سپس با شناخت برخی خصوصیات مدرنیستی و پسامدرنیستی اثر مورد پژوهش به عنوان رمانی متامدرنیستی، نشان می‌دهد چطور برخی عناصر متامدرنیستی، خصوصاً در مساله‌ آگاهی، تغییریافته‌ عناصر مدرنیستی است و تا چه اندازه این عناصر میان اعصار مدرن و پسامدرن در نوسان هستند. در نتیجه بازخوانی این رمان‌ با دیدی متامدرنی، نگارندگان اثبات می‌کنند که از آنجا که با توجه به شناخت از رفتارهای قبلی فرد می‌توان به پیش‌بینی رفتارهای آتی او رسید، به سادگی می‌توان به انتخاب‌های او نیز آگاهی پیدا کرد، به همین جهت آگاهی در شخصیتهای این رمان تلقین شده است. در این مقاله، مساله‌ آگاهی به عنوان محور بررسی قرار دارد و نویسندگان بر آن هستند تا با به چالش کشیدن نظریه‌ متامدرن نتیجه بگیرند که در این عصر آگاهی از پیش تعیین شده، اختیاری، و تلقین شده است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

Consciousness in Metamodern Era: Rereading The Bone Clocks by David Mitchell

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamideh Vesalifallah 1
  • Roya Yaghoubi 2
  • Seyyed Shahabeddin Sadati 3
1 Islamic Azad University, South Tehran branch
2 Department of English Language and Literature,, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Assistant Professor, Department of English Language and Literature, Roudehen Branch, Islamic Azad University, Roudehen, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
This article examines the issue of consciousness in The Bone Clocks written by David Mitchell as a metamodernist novel. Specifically, this article first defines consciousness and observes the characteristics of the issue of consciousness in this new era. Then, recognizing specific modernist and postmodernist characteristics of the researched work, shows how some metamodernist elements, especially in the issue of consciousness, are changed by modernist elements and to what extent these elements fluctuate between modern and postmodern eras. Rereading this novel with a metamodern perspective, the authors prove that, knowing about a person’s previous behavior leads to the prediction of his future behavior, hence, it is easy to gain awareness of his choices, which is the reason consciousness in the characters of this novel is inculcated. In this article, the authors aim to challenge metamodern theory and conclude that in this era, consciousness is predetermined, optional, and inculcated.
Background of the Study
David Mitchell refuses the old rules and commits to the fact that death is not the end of consciousness; quite contrary, it can emerge as a god-like, incarnated presence in another shape. Sami Paavilanin also insists on this fact in Mitchell’s novel in which he represents beings who are the incarnation of old selves. He claims that the presence of Atemorals and Horologists in this novel can defend the idea that consciousness can be relocated from one body to another. Also, metamodernist writers utilize a kind of stream of pre-consciousness to refer to the characters’ instincts, that they were aware of the consequences even before they commit to action; however, they intend to manipulate this fact. None of the previous studies in the field of metamodernism examined the roots of this pre-consciousness, though this article aims to conceptualize this very fact.
Methodology
Irma Mayer believes that analyzing a text, a metamodernist must redeploy between modernism and postmodernism, then decide which can offer a better solution to the problem. Oscillating among different poles and recognizing the binaries can help to evaluate the characters’ behaviors regarding consciousness. In the 2010 article ‘Notes on metamodernism’, Vermeulen and Van den Akker argue that metamodernism is a concept which “oscillates” between modernism and postmodernism and they describe it as a “structure of feeling” (101). They state that “metamodernism should be situated epistemologically with (post)modernism, ontologically between (post)modernism, and historically beyond (post)modernism” (101), which suggests that they believe it is possible to go back to modernism, while also acknowledge that modernism is something of the past. Other thoughts such as Bourdieu’s ideas on habitus and the game that each field presents to the characters, as well as Zizek’s idea of the real enlighten how the writer justifies the characters’ consciousness.
Conclusion
Although the consciousness of the characters in this novel appears forced, at the same time they are considered optional, because the choice is theirs from the very beginning. In this article, it was suggested that in the metamodern era, opposite poles are in flux, and unlike the postmodern era, which considered feelings and emotions to be invalid, the current era has put the mental position of the characters in relation to each other and wants to be emotional and arouse emotions. Another point that this work portrayed was that everyone has a version of reality; therefore, the characters reached their mental awareness according to what was objective for them. The external events are not unaffected and in fact, it is the external events that control the consciousness, though, at the same time it is an internal and instinctive consciousness. This pendulum-like swing between polar opposites aptly captures the mutual characteristics of both/neither dynamic.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Consciousness
  • Authority
  • Postmodernism
  • Inculcated
  • Force
  • Metamodernism
  • Modernism
Bourdieu, Pierre. The Logic of Practice, Richard Nice. California: Stanford University Press, 1990. 
Callaway, Elizabeth. “Seeing What’s Right in Front of Us: The Bone Clocks, Climate Change, and Human Attention.” Environmental Humanities, vol. 7, no. 11, 2018, pp. 2-12.
Childs, Peter. “Food Chain: Predatory Links in the Novels of David Mitchell,” Études Anglaises, vol. 68, no. 2, 2015, pp. 183-195.
Cuddon, John. Anthony. A dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. 5th ed., New York: Penguin Books, 2014.
Ermens, Bregje. Metamodernism: Modernist Elements in Contemporary British and Irish Fiction. Master Thesis. Radboud University, 2018.
Eve, Martin Paul. “Thomas Pynchon, David Foster Wallace and the problem of Metamodernism.” C21 Literature: Journal of 21st century Writings, vol. 1, no. 1, 2020, pp. 7-25.
Gibbons, Alison. “Postmodernism Is Dead. What Comes Next?” Times Literary Supplement. 12 June 2017. www.thetls.co.uk/articles/public/postmodernism-dead-comes-next/.
Harris, Paul. “David Mitchell in the Laboratory of Time: AN Interview with the Author.” Substance, vol. 136, no. 44, 2015, pp. 8-17.
James. David and Urmila Seshagiri. “Metamodernism: Narratives of Continuity and Revolution.” PMLA, vol. 129, no. 1, 2014, pp. 87-100. 
Jenkins, Richard. Pierre Bourdieu. Key Sociologists Series. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Lavery, Nick. “Conciousness and the Extended Mind in the Metamodernist Novel.” English Studies, vol. 99, 2018, pp. 755-765.
Malabou, Catherine. “Go Wonder: Subjectivity and Affects in Neurobiological Times.” In Self and Emotional Life: Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and Neuroscience. Ed. Johnston Adrian and Cathherine Malabou, pp. 1-72. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.
McCallum-Smith, Susan. “Stream of Pre-Consciousness: Susan McCallum-Smith Interviews Eimear McBride.” Los Angeles Review of Books, 2014. lareviewofbooks.org/article/stream-pre-consciousness/
Meyer, Irma. “The Resurrection of Modernistic Public Relations: A Metamodern Perspective.” ESSACHESS, vol 14, no. 27, 2021, pp 17-28.
Mitchell, David. The Bone Clocks. London: Sceptre, 2015.
Paavilainen, Sami Petteri. The Dialectics of Globalization: Socio-Ecological Responsibility in David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas and The Bone Clocks. Pro-graduation Dissertation. University of Helsinki, 2018.
Radchenko, Simon. “Metamodern Gaming: Literary Analysis of The Last of Us.” Interlitteraria, vol 20, no. 1, 2020, pp. 246-259.
Rowlands, Mark. The New Science of the Mind: From Extended Mind to Embodied Phenomenology. London: Bradford, 2010.
Seshagiri. Urmila. Race and the Modernist Imagination. New York: Cornell University Press, 2010.
Shaw, Karen. “Some Magic is Normality: Fantastical Cosmopolitanism in David Mitchell’s The Bone Clocks.” C21 Literature: Journal of 21st century Writings, vol. 6, no. 5, 2018, pp. 1-19.
Turner, Luke. “The Metamodernist Manifesto.” 2011. http://www.metamodrnism.org/.
Van den Akker, Robin, and Alison Gibbons, and Thimotheus Vermeulen.  Metamodernism;          Historicity, Affect, and Depth After Postmodernism. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017.
Vermeulen, Timotheus and Robin van den Akker. “Notes on Metamodernism” Journal of Aesthetics & Culture, 2010. http://www.metamodrnism.org/
Wallace, David Foster. “E Unibus Pluran; Television and U.S. Fiction.” The Review of Contemporary Fiction, 1993.
Zizek, Slavoj. Welcome to the Desert of Real. London: Verso Books, 2002.