مقایسۀ ترجمه‌های فارسیِ کتاب تصویری «درخت بخشنده»: از منظر برهم‌کنش عناصر غیرکلامی

نوع مقاله : مقاله علمی پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 گروه ادبیات کودک و نوجوان، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران

2 دانشکده ، علوم تربیتی‌ـ تاریخ و فلسفۀ آموزش و پرورش، دانشگاه پیام نور،همدان، ایران.

چکیده

«درخت بخشنده» کتابی تصویری از سیلورستاین، نویسندۀ آمریکایی داستان‌های کودک، است. این کتاب به بسیاری از زبان‌ها ترجمه شده و مورد خوانش و تفاسیر متعددی نیز قرار گرفته است. با توجه به کثرت ترجمه‌های فارسی و خوانش‌های گوناگون مفسرانِ آن، اثر مذکور برای موضوع ترجمه‌شناسیِ این مقاله اختیار شده است. پژوهش پیش‌ِرو با روش تحلیلی‌ـ توصیفی در پی پاسخ به چگونگی برهم‌کنش سازه‌های غیرکلامی (تصاویر، ریزنقش‌ها، صفحه‌بندی، تایپوگرافی و رنگ فونت) در ترجمه‌های فارسی اثر مذکور است. سازه‌های پیرازبانی (سبک، لحن و امثالهم) و پیرامتن‌ها (طرح جلد، عنوان و امثالهم)، اگرچه می‌توانند سازه‌هایی غیرکلامی به شمار آیند، در دامنۀ این پژوهش قرار ندارند. اسکات و نیکولایوا کتاب‌های تصویری کودک را مورد واکاوی قرار داده‌اند و انواع برهم‌کنش متن و تصویر را به پنج دسته تقسیم کرده‌اند. این مقاله دسته‌بندی پنج‌گانۀ اسکات‌ـ نیکولایوا را نه‌تنها برای سازۀ غیرکلامیِ تصویر؛ بلکه برای برهم‌کنش تمام سازه‌های غیرکلامی دیگر نیز کارآمد می‌داند. از همین رو نتیجۀ پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که اولا، عناصر غیرکلامی به پنج روش (تقارنی، تکمیلی، توسیعی، ترکیبی و تناقضی) با یکدیگر (و با متن) ایجاد برهم‌کنش می‌کنند؛ ثانیا، ترجمه لزوماً نسبت‌به برهم‌کنش‌های غیرکلامیِ متنِ زبان‌اصلی وفادار نمی‌ماند. فاصلۀ فرهنگی متن زبان‌اصلی و متنِ ترجمه‌شده و نیز جایگاه برجستۀ تصویر، صفحه‌بندی، تایپوگرافی در صنعت نشر کتاب کودک ضرورت این پژوهش را ایجاب می‌نماید.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

A Comparison of Persian Translations of the Picture Book of "The Giving Tree": From the Perspective of the Interaction of Non-Verbal Elements

نویسندگان [English]

  • Amir Hossein Zanjanbar 1
  • Naimeh Ameri Feleihi 2
1 Children ̓s and Young Adult Literature, Department of Persian Language and Literature, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Faculty of Science Education, Payame Noor University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Non-verbal elements are the invisible conduit for transmitting the personal ideology of the translator and other translators idiots (art director, editor, publisher, etc.). Due to a large number of translations of Silverstein's "Giving Tree" from English to Persian, and the various readings of its commentators, this work has been chosen for the subject of translation of this article. The present research seeks to answer, how non-verbal elements (images, micro-patterns, pagination, typography, and font color) interact in the translated books of the mentioned work. . In the field of children's literature, the interaction of text and image has always been considered by theorists such as Scott and Nikolajeva. The innovation of the present study is that it generalizes their interactions from the level of text-image relationship to the level of non-verbal factors. The results show that the interaction of non-verbal elements is of five types: symmetric, complementary, expansive, counterpointing, and paradoxical. The cultural distance between the original language text and the translated text, as well as the prominent position of image, pagination, typography, etc. in the children's book publishing industry, necessitate performing the research. and in this regard, This research aims to answer three basic questions in the field of Persian translations of “The Giving Tree” (Silverstein, 2011): 1- How can the Nikolajeva-Scott (2019)  Fifth Interaction Pattern, in terms of classifying types of image-text interactions, be generalized to, a model for classifying the types of interactions of non-verbal elements? 2. What are the differences and similarities between the different translations of “The Giving Tree” (Silverstein, 2011) in terms of the interaction of non-verbal elements (image, pagination, typography, miniatures, and font color)? 3- In the various translations of above- mentioned book, what are the types of interactions of non-verbal elements?
Background: Mohsenianrad (2014), while quoting Bosmajian's definition, considers non-verbal communication channels to be very wide and expands its scope from facial expressions to fashion, from symbolic actions to dance, theater, pantomime, and music, from the influential currents of time to the flow of traffic, from brutal hegemony to clever diplomacy. In Iran, the articles that have been done on non-verbal communication, which have focused on the non-verbal communication of stories, have focused on the body language and the way the characters dress. Unlike studies conducted in Iran, which generally focus on the non-verbal element of body language, the subject of leading research is the axis of space (such as the proximity of pages in pagination, the proximity of images, and the like), and aesthetics (such as typography, miniatures, etc.).
Research Methodology: through descriptive-comparative analytical methods, it compares semantic changes that the translation process has imposed on these interactions, with the original language text. The data in this article are taken from the original language book of “The Giving Tree”, by Silverstein, and the nine Persian translations of the book. In this research, in terms of non-verbal elements (image, typography, pagination, and font), each of these translations is compared with each other, and also the non-verbal elements of the translations, with their corresponding non-verbal elements, are adapted in the original language version. In this regard, the research expands the fivefold division of Scott-Nikolajeva, from the level of text-image interaction to the level of interaction of other non-verbal structures.
Conclusion: This study shows that non-verbal elements enclose the text, like a glass frame, without being seen themselves. Many of the non-verbal elements of the books being translated are modified according to the culture and sphere of the target language.  Thus, the non-verbal factors in the various translations of “The Giving Tree” (Silverstein, 2011) may not be semantically identical to the original language text; That is, texts can find new meaning through the interaction of non-verbal factors in line with the ideology of the translator, translation editor, and second publisher.  Non-verbal image factors, pagination, and typography can enter into semantic interaction in five ways: symmetric, complementary, expansive, counterpointing, and paradoxical.
When two non-verbal elements represent the same information, their type of interaction is "symmetrical interaction." When two non-verbal elements fill in each other's gaps, their interaction is of a "complementary interaction" type. To understand complementary interaction, the audience usually does not need conscious attention and receives this interaction, automatically and unknowingly. When two non-verbal elements expand the meaning of each other (usually the expansion of this meaning requires the conscious reflection and careful attention of the audience), then their relationship will be of the "expansion interaction" type. In the "hybrid interaction" situation, the two non-verbal elements each have a different narrative, and from their interaction, a new meaning is created, and without each of them, the decoding of the message is not accomplished. The most severe incompatibility between the two non-verbal elements occurs in "contradictory interaction."

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • adaptive-critic
  • translation study
  • child story
  • Picturebook
  • Non-Verbal elements
  • Shell Silverstein
  • Nikolajeva
Ahmadi, Zeynab. Investigating the Impact of Website Color Element on Online Consumer Shopping Behavior. V(3). N(2). 2017. https://civilica.com/doc/721411/
Baker, M.. Reframing conflict in translation. Social Semiotics, 17(2),  Pp 151–169. 2007.
Bassnett, S., & Lefevere, A. Translation, history and culture. London: Printer Publishers. 1990.
⦁    Bavanpouri, Mas′oud; Gheybi, Abdolahad.; Hajizadeh, Mahin.; Parvini, Khalil. ⦁    The Semiotics of Non-Verbal Communication in “Al-Taliani” Novel by Shukri Mabkhout. Lisān-I Mobin. V(1), N(38). Pp 1-22. 2020.
Holmes, A and Galchen, R. "The Giving Tree: Tender Story of Unconditional Love or Disturbing Tale of Selfishnes?" . (30 Sep 2014) https://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/books/review/the-giving-tree-tender-story-of-unconditional-love-or-disturbing-tale-of-selfishness.html.
⦁    Hassanzadeh, Abdullah; Heidari Abkenar, Mirali. and Ghazaleh. A study of the functions and frequency of non-verbal communication in the novel "His Eyes".Rokhsare Zaban. N(9). Pp 81-61. 2009.
⦁    Heydari, Gholamreza. Literary and rhetorical language of color in non-verbal communication, in Ferdowsi's Shahnameh. Journal of Literary Aesthetics.vol:7, N:39. Pp 189- 229. 2019. 
⦁    Jaberirad, Maedeh.; Farajpahou, Abdolhossein. The place of color in nonverbal communication". Library and Information Science Studies. V(4), N(10). Pp 97-114. 2012.
⦁    Kolahchyan, Fatemeh. & Jamshidi, Zahra. A Study of the Functions of Non-Verbal Communications in Prince Ehtejab. Research on Fictional Literature. 1(3). Pp 109- 134. 2013.
⦁    Mohsenianrad. Mehdi. Communication: Human communication (interpersonal, group, collective). Tehran: Soroush. 2014.
MacDonald. Ruth . K.  "Special Critique: The Root Meaning of the Giving  Tree". (Razi. Hirmandi, Trans.). Children and Adolescent Literature. N(24). Pp 57- 68. 2001.
Nikolajeva, Maria. & Scott, Carole. How Picturebooks Work?, (Fariba. Khoshbakht & Mahboubeh. Alborzi, Trans.). Madreseh: Tehran. 2021.
⦁    Nikolajeva, Maria. & Scott, Carole. Aesthetic Approaches to Children's Literature: An Introduction.(Mehdi. Hejvani & Fatemeh. Zamani, Trans.). ⦁    Institute for the Intellectual Development of Children and Young Adults: Tehran.(2019). 
Pease, Allen and Barbara. The Definitive Book of Body Language. Australia: Pease International. 2004.
⦁    Razi, Ahmad.& Hajati, Somaiyeh. Analysis of non-verbal communication signs in the story of two friends. Children's Literature Studies. V(2). N(1). Pp 91-114. 2011.
⦁    Roy, Berko.; Wolvin, Andrew. And Darlyn. Communicating: A Social, Career, and Cultural Focus. (Davood. Izadi. And Mohammad. ′Arabi, Trans.). Cultural Research Office: Tehran. 2008.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. London & UK: Penguin Books Ltd. 2011.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Hayedeh. Karroubi, Trans.).  Nardeban: Tehran. 2021.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Samin. Bozorgmand, Trans.).  Saless: Tehran. 2020.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Zahra. Ghena′ati, Trans.).  Hormoz: Ahvaz. 2019.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Parya. Hosseyni, Trans.).  Dimond Boulorin: Tehran. 2018.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Amirhoushang. Eghbali, Trans.).  Abrang: Tehran. 2018.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Sima. Majidzadeh, Trans.).  Gol Aftab: Mashhad. 2011.
Silverstein, Shel. Mrs giving tree. (Hormoz. Riahi, Trans.).  Tandis Library: Tehran. 2005.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Aliakbar. J′afarzadeh, Trans.).  Children's Bookshop: Tehran. 1999.
Silverstein, Shel. The giving tree. (Razi. Hirmandi, Trans.).  Arvin: Tehran. 1999.
⦁    Shahraki, Foroozan.; Arab Yusofabadi, Abdolbaset. And Habibi, Ali Asghar. " The relationship between the sign and the modulus in non-verbal communication in the novel Ayyām maʻah". New Critical Arabic Literature. V(11), N(20). Pp 59-92. 2021.
⦁    Yahya'ei Ileh, Ahma. Principles of customer orientation. Tehran:  ⦁    Jajarmi. 2006.
Zanjanbar, Amir Hossein. The rhetorical-narrative function of "Image" in children's literature. Theoretical Principles of Visual Arts. V(7). N(1). 2022