<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Shahid Beheshti University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Critical Language and Literary Studies</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>20087330</Issn>
				<Volume>13</Volume>
				<Issue>17</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>10</Month>
					<Day>22</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>From Semiotics to Language Signs A Brief Survey in Translation Methodologies from a Semiotic Standpoint</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>From Semiotics to Language Signs A Brief Survey in Translation Methodologies from a Semiotic Standpoint</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>69</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>78</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">99940</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abdollah</FirstName>
					<LastName>Baradaran</LastName>
<Affiliation>Islamic Azad University (IAU), Central Tehran Branch</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2016</Year>
					<Month>05</Month>
					<Day>17</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>If we presume the process of translation to a Habermasian “communicative action”, then we may just as well have to delineate the theory of translation under the rubrics of a general theory of communication as has been the case with a concept like discourse analysis. Evidently, the same logic applies to semiotics in the realm of human language. Therefore, applying intertextuality which is one of the most decisive guiding principles of semiotics, as a practical approach to the theory, practice, and criticism of translation will prove useful. After a sweeping review of the fundaments and applications of semiotics in the field of linguistics and in translation studies, in particular, the present article will highlight a brilliant example of the semiotic approach to literary translation from the contemporary history of translating classical English literature to Farsi.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">If we presume the process of translation to a Habermasian “communicative action”, then we may just as well have to delineate the theory of translation under the rubrics of a general theory of communication as has been the case with a concept like discourse analysis. Evidently, the same logic applies to semiotics in the realm of human language. Therefore, applying intertextuality which is one of the most decisive guiding principles of semiotics, as a practical approach to the theory, practice, and criticism of translation will prove useful. After a sweeping review of the fundaments and applications of semiotics in the field of linguistics and in translation studies, in particular, the present article will highlight a brilliant example of the semiotic approach to literary translation from the contemporary history of translating classical English literature to Farsi.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">semiotics</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Intertextuality</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Sign systems</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Inter-semiotic relations</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Significant functions</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Formal features</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://clls.sbu.ac.ir/article_99940_ab399f78d58b3d1d9415202b0558b0a0.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
