<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>دانشگاه شهید بهشتی</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>20087330</Issn>
				<Volume>23</Volume>
				<Issue>36</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>21</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>The Dualistic Dynamics of Plumwoodian Philosophy
in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>The Dualistic Dynamics of Plumwoodian Philosophy in Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>89</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>98</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">106910</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.48308/clls.2026.243722.1432</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>FA</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>ستوده</FirstName>
					<LastName>میجانی</LastName>
<Affiliation>M.A. in English Literature, English Department, School of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0002-3932-8081</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>هاله</FirstName>
					<LastName>زرگرزاده</LastName>
<Affiliation>استادیار، دانشکده ادبیات دانشگاه ارومیه</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>02</Month>
					<Day>24</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This article examines Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997) through the lens of Val Plumwood’s ecofeminism. In her novel, Roy illustrates how Ammu, the focal character of this research, suffers from cultural, ideological, social, and economic exploitation and subjugation. Nature is likewise irresponsibly degraded and deteriorated by humans in the novel. While scholars have analyzed this novel from diverse ecocritical, feminist, ecofeminist, and postcolonial ecofeminist perspectives, it has not been examined through Plumwood’s theoretical framework. This study presents an ecofeminist reading of the novel, employing Plumwood’s concept of “dualism” and its three key features, namely, “backgrounding (denial),” “radical exclusion (hyperseparation),” as well as “instrumentalism (objectification).” We argue that the dualistic structures associated with gender, caste, and social class are dismantled by Ammu, even though she is subjected to backgrounding, radical exclusion, and instrumentalism by both her family and society. Furthermore, nature, which is also vulnerable to exploitation, challenges humanity’s anthropocentric dominance. The findings indicate that, despite the oppressive cultural, social, and ideological forces within Indian society, both Ammu and nature display resilience and agency. Although Ammu meets a tragic end, she heroically dies as an active resister of man-made laws rather than as a passive conformist.</Abstract>
			<OtherAbstract Language="FA">This article examines Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things (1997) through the lens of Val Plumwood’s ecofeminism. In her novel, Roy illustrates how Ammu, the focal character of this research, suffers from cultural, ideological, social, and economic exploitation and subjugation. Nature is likewise irresponsibly degraded and deteriorated by humans in the novel. While scholars have analyzed this novel from diverse ecocritical, feminist, ecofeminist, and postcolonial ecofeminist perspectives, it has not been examined through Plumwood’s theoretical framework. This study presents an ecofeminist reading of the novel, employing Plumwood’s concept of “dualism” and its three key features, namely, “backgrounding (denial),” “radical exclusion (hyperseparation),” as well as “instrumentalism (objectification).” We argue that the dualistic structures associated with gender, caste, and social class are dismantled by Ammu, even though she is subjected to backgrounding, radical exclusion, and instrumentalism by both her family and society. Furthermore, nature, which is also vulnerable to exploitation, challenges humanity’s anthropocentric dominance. The findings indicate that, despite the oppressive cultural, social, and ideological forces within Indian society, both Ammu and nature display resilience and agency. Although Ammu meets a tragic end, she heroically dies as an active resister of man-made laws rather than as a passive conformist.</OtherAbstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Arundhati Roy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">The God of Small Things</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Val Plumwood</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ammu</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Nature</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">dualism</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://clls.sbu.ac.ir/article_106910_91a6fa8791f364bf08a1b495d8f266ec.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
