نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی

Critical Language and Literary Studies

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اخبار و اعلانات

تأثیر‌‌‌ آموزشی‌‌‌ سمینار ‌‌سقراطی‌‌‌ در پرورش‌‌ تفکر‌‌ انتقادی‌ ‌دانشجویان‌ ‌‌ادبیات‌

نوع مقاله : علمی - پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 هیچ گونه سازمانی

2 موسسه آموزش عالی صبح صادق- دانشگاه اصفهان

چکیده

اهداف‌‌ این‌ ‌پژوهش‌‌‌ بررسی‌‌ تأثیر‌ سمینار سقراطی‌‌‌ در ایجاد تفکر‌ انتقادی‌‌ به‌‌‌عنوان‌ منبعی‌‌ برای‌‌‌‌ بهبود یادگیری‌ ادبیات در دانشجویان‌‌ ادبیات‌ سال ‌‌آخر‌ ایران‌ بود و همچنین‌ بررسی‌ اینکه‌ تا چه ‌حد این روش‌ جایگزین، از رضایت معلمان‌ و دانشجویان ادبیات‌ برخوردار بوده‌ است. برای این منظور، از 128 دانشجوی‌‌ ‌کارشناسی‌‌ ادبیات‌‌ انگلیسی‌‌ مشغول به تحصیل در موسسه آموزش‌ عالی صبح‌ صادق، یک نمونۀ‌‌40 نفری از دانشجویان سال آخر، مذکر و ‌مونث، با نمونه‌‌‌گیری هدف‌‌مند انتخاب شد. سن ‌‌شرکت‌‌‌کنندگان ‌بین 20 تا 30 سال بود. آن‌ها به‌‌طور تصادفی در دو گروه قرار گرفتند، یعنی گروه کنترل و آزمایشی، که هر‌ ‌کدام‌ شامل 20 نفر بود. آزمون مهارت تفکر انتقادی‌ کالیفرنیا‌ ‌(فاسیون و فاسیون 1990) به‌‌عنوان یک پیش‌‌‌‌‌‌‌‌آزمون‌ استفاده شد تا مهارت تفکر انتقادی‌ شرکت‌‌‌‌‌کنندگان را در هر دو گروه مشخص کند. ‌‌در پایان آزمایش که ده جلسه به طول انجامید، همان آزمون به شرکت‌‌‌‌‌کنندگان در هر دو گروه داده شد. یافته‌‌‌های ‌‌پژوهش حاکی‌ از تأثیر مثبت‌ سمینار سقراطی‌ بر مهارت‌ تفکر‌ انتقادی بود؛ علاوه‌‌ بر این، اطلاعات کیفیِ‌‌ به‌‌‌‌‌دست‌‌‌‌‌‌آمده‌ از پرسشنامۀ ‌‌‌تشریحی و مصاحبه‌ از معلم سمینار شواهد معتبری از رجحان روش‌ بدیع‌‌ بر روش‌ سنتی‌‌ به‌‌‌همراه‌ داشت. امید است ‌‌یافته‌‌‌‌‌‌ها دارای پیامدهای مهمی برای استادان‌ ادبیات و دانشجویان‌ باشد. 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Instructional Efficacy of Socratic Seminar for Cultivating Critical Thinking in Literature Students

نویسندگان [English]

  • Samaneh Afghari 1
  • Helen Ouliaeinia 2

1 No organization

2 Sobh-e-Sadegh Higher Education Institute, Tehran University

چکیده [English]

This study aimed to investigate the impact of Socratic seminar on cultivating critical thinking as a resource for improving Iranian senior literature students learning of literature and the extent to which this alternative method enjoys appreciation on the part of literature teachers and students. For this purpose, from a target population of 128 BA English literature students studying at Sobh-e-Sadegh Institute of Higher Education, a sample of 40 senior students, both male and female, were selected, purposive sampling. The participants were 20 to 30. They were randomly assigned into two groups, namely control and experimental, 20 each. The California Critical Thinking Skills Test (Facione&Facione 1990) was used as a pretest prior the treatment to specify the participants’ critical thinking skills in both groups. At the end of the treatment which lasted ten sessions, the same test was given to the participants in both groups. The findings reported the positive impact of Socratic seminar on critical thinking skills; additionally, the qualitatively obtained data from an open-ended questionnaire and an interview of the seminar teacher yielded credible evidence of the preference of the novel method over the traditional one. Indubitably, the findings have significant implications for literature professors and students.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Critical Thinking
  • Socratic Seminar
  • Learners’ Attitude
  • and Teachers’ Attitude
مراجع
  1. Angelo, Edward. The Teaching of Critical Thinking. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner N.V., 1971.
  2. Arnold, Genevieve H. and Alice Hart, and Karen Campbell.“Introducing the Wednesday Revolution.” EducationLeadership 45.7(1988): 48
  3. Bell, Melody J. A Response-based Approach to Teaching Literature: A Focus on Eight Grade. M.A. thesis.Texas Woman’s University, 1995.
  4. Bernasconi, Loretta E. Socratic seminars: Fostering an environment of critical thinking and self-confidence in the classroom. M.A. thesis.California State University, 2010.
  5. Brodin, Eva. Critical Thinking in Scholarship: Meanings, Conditions and Development. Lund: Lund University, 2007.
  6. Clark-Koellner, Karen, Lynn Stallings and Sue A. Hoover.“Socratic Seminars for Mathematics.”The Mathematics Teacher 95.9 (2002): 682-687.
  7. Copeland, Matt. Socratic Circles Fostering Critical and Creative Thinking in Middle and High School. Portland: Stenhouse, 2005.
  8. Demirci, Fatih. “Socrates: The Prophet of Life-Long Learning.” Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 46(2012): 4481-4486.
  9. Dewey, John. How We Think. Lexington: Heath, 1933.
  10. Elder, Linda and Richard Paul.“The Role of Socratic Questioning in Thinking, Teaching and Learning.”The Clearing House 71.5 (1998): 297-301.
  11. Ennis, Robert H. “Critical Thinking Assessment.” Theory into Practice 32.3 (1993): 179-186.
  12. Facione, Peter. A. Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts. Millbrae: California Academic Press, 2006.
  13. Garside, Colleen. “Look Who's Talking: A Comparison of Lecture and Group Discussion Teaching Strategies in Developing Critical Thinking Skills.” Communication Education 45.2(1996): 212-227.
  14. Griffiths, Gary andBriony J. Oates.“Lecture-free teaching for systems analysis: An action research study”. In Information Technology Education Joint Conference (pp.355-365), Pori, Finland, 2003.
  15. Halpern, Diane F. “Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training, and Metacognitive Monitoring.”American Psychologist53.4 (1998): 449-455.
  16. ‏Holden, James and John S. Schmit.Inquiry and the Literary Text: Constructing Discussions in the English Classroom. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 2002.
  17. Hughes, James. M. Education in America (3rded.). NewYork: Harper & Row, 1970.
  18. ‏
  19. Khalili, H. and Hossein Zadeh M. “Investigation of Reliability, Validity and Normality Persian Version of the California Critical Thinking Skills Test; Form B (CCTST).” Journal of Medical Education 3.1 (2003): 29-32.
  20. Khatib, Mohammad, Saeed Rezaei and Ali Derakhshan. “Literature in EFL/ESL Classroom.”English Language Teaching 4.1 (2011): 201-208.‏
  21. King, Alison. “Designing the Instructional Process to Enhance Critical Thinking across the Curriculum.”Teaching of Psychology 22.1 (1995): 13-17.‏
  22. Knezic, Dubravka, Theo Wubbels, Ed Elbers and Maaike Hajer.“The Socratic Dialogue and Teacher Education.Teaching and Teacher Education 26.4 (2009): 1104-1111.
  23. Lambright, Lesley L. “Creating a Dialogue: Socratic Seminars and Educational Reform.” Community College Journal 65.4 (1995): 30-34.
  24. Lazere, Donald. Critical Thinking in College English Studies. Urbana: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, 1987.
  25. McPeck, John E. Critical Thinking and Education. Oxford: Martin Robertson, 1981.
  26. Mc Tighe, J. Better Thinking and Learning: Building Effective Teaching through Educational Research. Maryland:Maryland State Department of Education.
  27. Metzger, Margaret. “Teaching Reading.”Phi Delta Kappan 80.3 (1998): 240–248.
  28. Nelms, Ben F. Literature in the Classroom: Readers, Texts, and Contexts. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English, 1988.
  29. Paul, Richard. “The State of Critical Thinking Today.”New Directions for Community Colleges 2005.130(2005): 27-38.
  30. Paul, Richard. Critical thinking: What every person needs to survive in a rapidly changing world. (2nded.). Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking, 1992.
  31. Paul, Richard and Linda Elder. “Critical Thinking: Strategies for Improving Student Learning, Part II.” Journal of Developmental Education 32.2 (2008): 34-35.‏
  32. Phelan, Jack Gordon. A Teacher Action Research Study: Enhancing Student Critical Thinking Knowledge, Skills, Dispositions, Application and Transfer in a Higher Education Technology Course. Diss. Capella University, 2012.
  33. Pihlgren, Ann. Socrates in the Classroom Rationales and Effects of Philosophizing with Children. Stockholm: Stockholm University, 2008.
  34. Pogrow, Stanley. “Teaching Thinking to At-risk Elementary Students.”Educational Leadership 45.7 (1988): 79-85.
  35. Roberson, Benjamin N. Motivation towards Learning Perceived in Socratic Seminar versus Traditional Lecture. Diss. Pepperdine University, 2013.
  36. Rosenblatt, Louise. Literature as Exploration.(5th ed.).New York: Modern Language Association, 1995.
  37. Rozgay-Miller, Janette M. Critical Thinking and Using Modern Information and Communication Technology. M.A. Thesis. Sierra Nevada College, 2009.
  38. Ruff, Lauren G. The Development of Critical Thinking Skills and Dispositions in First-year College Students: Infusing Critical Thinking Instruction into a First-year Transitions Course.Diss. University of Maryland, 2005.
  39. Strong, Michael. The Habit of Thought: From Socratic Seminars to Socratic Practice. Chapel Hill, NC: New View, 1996.
  40. Tarkington, S. A. Improving Critical Thinking Skills Using Paideia Seminars in a Seventh Grade Literature Curriculum. Diss. University of San Diego, 1988.
  41. Tung, Chi-An and Shu-Ying Chang. “Developing Critical Thinking through Literature Reading.”Feng Chia Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 19.3 (2009): 287-317.
  42. Tymoczko, Maria. “Using literature to develop critical thinking skills.”In M. Heiman and J. Slomian (Eds.).Thinking Skills Instruction: Concepts and Techniques. Washington: National Education Association, 1986, PP. 246-254.
  43. Yang, Ya-Ting C., Timothy J. Newby and Robert L. Bill.“Using Socratic Questioning to Promote Critical Thinking Skills through Asynchronous Discussion Forums in Distance Learning Environments.”American Journal of Distance Education 19.3 (2005): 163-181.
  44. Yeager, Natalie C. “Teaching Thinking to Teach Literature While Teaching Literature to Teach Thinking.”In Halpern, D. F., M. Heiman, and J. Slomianko (Eds.).“Thinking Skills Instruction: Concepts and Techniques.”Washington: National Education Association, 1987, pp. 134-144.
  45. Yusuf, Florence Adeoti and E. A. Adeoye. “Developing Critical Thinking and Communication Skills in Students: Implications for Practice in Education.” African Research Review 6.1 (2012): 311-324.
نقد زبان و ادبیات خارجی
دوره 12، شماره 16 - شماره پیاپی 16
اردیبهشت 1395
صفحه 31-53
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار